Rebel Café Forum Index
Get The Guide RegisterSearchFAQMemberlistUsergroupsLog in
Sony Vegas heat wave ripple issue

 
Reply to topic    Rebel Café Forum Index » Chapter 5: Editing View previous topic
View next topic
Sony Vegas heat wave ripple issue
Author Message
flip808



Joined: 12 Nov 2008
Posts: 363
Location: Houston Texas

Post Sony Vegas heat wave ripple issue Reply with quote
I made some animations in After Effects and saved them as QUICK TIME MPEG4 files.

They come out to about 200mb when rendered and look great when played back by themselves.

When I put them into Vegas with the rest of my project and do the final rendering no matter if it's an AVI or WMV file the After Effects animations

look like you are watcing them thru a pizza oven door.

Meaning "heat wave" looking ripples are all over the screen but just for those shots.

Vegas turns the smooth animations into crap!

Any ideas?

I've also tried saving them as photojpegs like Andrew Kramer suggests on videocopilot but it doesn't make a difference.
Mon Sep 28, 2009 11:15 pm View user's profile Send private message
crashandannie



Joined: 12 Aug 2007
Posts: 596
Location: Tallahassee, FL

Post Reply with quote
Have you tried rendering as TIFF images?

This would limit any compression involved, and then you could import them as an image sequence into your project. Also be sure your AE settings match your Vegas project settings (size, framerate, etc.) Re-sizing or changes in framerate or re-compression can cause the effect you are seeing, at least in earlier versions of Final Cut (not a Vegas user, sorry.) The last 2 FCPs (6 & 7) handle such changes pretty well.

Hope this helps!

_________________
Jamie
www.crashandannie.com
Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:34 am View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jussing



Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 722
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Post Reply with quote
I second averything crash says, but you might also try to right-click your clips in Vegas, and make sure they're not being deinterlaced by Vegas. Some applications (including Vegas, as I recall) will automatically deinterlace your clip if it's a standard TV resolution.
Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:02 am View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
flip808



Joined: 12 Nov 2008
Posts: 363
Location: Houston Texas

Post Reply with quote
Problem solved! Very Happy

Went in like you suggested and right clicked on properties for the troubled clips and selected REDUCE INTERLACE FLICKER and now no more heat wave ripples. Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy


Thanks so much for helping me out! Cool
Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:05 pm View user's profile Send private message
Jussing



Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 722
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Post Reply with quote
I'm glad it helped, but that's not really what I meant, and I think what you have achieved is just a cheap fix (that propably also reduces your image's effective resolution), you can do one notch better:

You need to go to the next tab, "Media", and there's a field that says "field order", which propably says "upper field first" or "lower field first". Set that to "none (progressive scan)", and you're a happier man with better video quality.
Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:02 pm View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
flip808



Joined: 12 Nov 2008
Posts: 363
Location: Houston Texas

Post Reply with quote
YES! you are right again. Thanks for taking the time to follow back up on this.

You saved my ass on this one!!!!!! Laughing
Tue Sep 29, 2009 6:16 pm View user's profile Send private message
Ghost Tree



Joined: 20 Apr 2009
Posts: 48
Location: Santa Barbara

Post Reply with quote
As a follow, how can one *intentionally* create those heat wave effects in Vegas?
Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:13 am View user's profile Send private message
TRCedillo



Joined: 13 Jun 2010
Posts: 1

Post Reply with quote
Quote:
Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 691
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark


Post Reply with quote
Planet Hollywood Hotel Vegas Las Vegas I'm glad it helped, but that's not really what I meant, and I think what you have achieved is just a cheap fix (that propably also reduces your image's effective resolution), you can do one notch better:

You need to go to the next tab, "Media", and there's a field that says "field order", which propably says "upper field first" or "lower field first". Set that to "none (progressive scan)", and you're a happier man with better video quality.


Was having similar problem. Sometimes the solution is so simple but would still be trying to figure out. Thanks for the post, TR

_________________
I love to travel, but hate to arrive.--Albert Einstein

Last edited by TRCedillo on Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:50 am; edited 1 time in total
Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:44 am View user's profile Send private message
romeor



Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 1

Post Reply with quote
TRCedillo wrote:
Quote:
Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 691
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
I'm glad it helped, but that's not really what I meant, and I think what you have achieved is just a cheap fix (that propably also reduces your image's effective resolution), you can do one notch better:
You need to go to the next tab, "Media", and there's a field that says "field order", which propably says "upper field first" or "lower field first". Set that to "none (progressive scan)", and you're a happier man with better video quality.
Venetian Las Vegas Vegas Night Clubs
Post Reply with quote

Was having similar problem. Sometimes the solution is so simple but would still be trying to figure out. Thanks for the post, TR

__________

Ahaaaaaa. I wish I would have read this post sooner rather than later but I am so relieved to see that there is a quick fix to this madness.
Thanks!


_________________
Fondly,
R. Omero
Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:51 pm View user's profile Send private message
bradsar



Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 1

Post Reply with quote
romeor wrote:
TRCedillo wrote:
Quote:
Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 691
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
I'm glad it helped, but that's not really what I meant, and I think what you have achieved is just a cheap fix (that propably also reduces your image's effective resolution), you can do one notch better:
You need to go to the next tab, "Media", and there's a field that says "field order", which propably says "upper field first" or "lower field first". Set that to "none (progressive scan)", and you're a happier man with better video quality.
Rio Hotel Vegas Las Vegas Palazzo
Post Reply with quote

Was having similar problem. Sometimes the solution is so simple but would still be trying to figure out. Thanks for the post, TR

__________

Ahaaaaaa. I wish I would have read this post sooner rather than later but I am so relieved to see that there is a quick fix to this madness.
Thanks!

I can't seem to locate "field order"... UGHHHH I am frustrated!

_________________
Live to read....
Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:01 am View user's profile Send private message
tlove1111



Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Posts: 2

Post Reply with quote
bradsar wrote:
romeor wrote:
TRCedillo wrote:
Quote:
Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 691
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
I'm glad it helped, but that's not really what I meant, and I think what you have achieved is just a cheap fix (that propably also reduces your image's effective resolution), you can do one notch better:
You need to go to the next tab, "Media", and there's a field that says "field order", which propably says "upper field first" or "lower field first". Set that to "none (progressive scan)", and you're a happier man with better video quality.

Caesars Palace Hotel Las Vegas
New York New York Hotel Vegas

Post Reply with quote

Was having similar problem. Sometimes the solution is so simple but would still be trying to figure out. Thanks for the post, TR

__________

Ahaaaaaa. I wish I would have read this post sooner rather than later but I am so relieved to see that there is a quick fix to this madness.
Thanks!

I can't seem to locate "field order"... UGHHHH I am frustrated!


any luck :/??
-tay
Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:39 pm View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:    
Reply to topic    Rebel Café Forum Index » Chapter 5: Editing All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to: 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Based on design by Freestyle XL