| Author |
Message |
flip808
Joined: 12 Nov 2008 Posts: 363 Location: Houston Texas |
|
Sony Vegas heat wave ripple issue |
|
I made some animations in After Effects and saved them as QUICK TIME MPEG4 files.
They come out to about 200mb when rendered and look great when played back by themselves.
When I put them into Vegas with the rest of my project and do the final rendering no matter if it's an AVI or WMV file the After Effects animations
look like you are watcing them thru a pizza oven door.
Meaning "heat wave" looking ripples are all over the screen but just for those shots.
Vegas turns the smooth animations into crap!
Any ideas?
I've also tried saving them as photojpegs like Andrew Kramer suggests on videocopilot but it doesn't make a difference.
|
|
| Mon Sep 28, 2009 11:15 pm |
|
 |
crashandannie
Joined: 12 Aug 2007 Posts: 596 Location: Tallahassee, FL |
|
|
|
Have you tried rendering as TIFF images?
This would limit any compression involved, and then you could import them as an image sequence into your project. Also be sure your AE settings match your Vegas project settings (size, framerate, etc.) Re-sizing or changes in framerate or re-compression can cause the effect you are seeing, at least in earlier versions of Final Cut (not a Vegas user, sorry.) The last 2 FCPs (6 & 7) handle such changes pretty well.
Hope this helps!
_________________ Jamie
www.crashandannie.com |
|
| Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:34 am |
|
 |
Jussing

Joined: 29 Jun 2007 Posts: 722 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark |
|
|
|
I second averything crash says, but you might also try to right-click your clips in Vegas, and make sure they're not being deinterlaced by Vegas. Some applications (including Vegas, as I recall) will automatically deinterlace your clip if it's a standard TV resolution.
|
|
| Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:02 am |
|
 |
flip808
Joined: 12 Nov 2008 Posts: 363 Location: Houston Texas |
|
|
|
Problem solved!
Went in like you suggested and right clicked on properties for the troubled clips and selected REDUCE INTERLACE FLICKER and now no more heat wave ripples.
Thanks so much for helping me out! 
|
|
| Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:05 pm |
|
 |
Jussing

Joined: 29 Jun 2007 Posts: 722 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark |
|
|
|
I'm glad it helped, but that's not really what I meant, and I think what you have achieved is just a cheap fix (that propably also reduces your image's effective resolution), you can do one notch better:
You need to go to the next tab, "Media", and there's a field that says "field order", which propably says "upper field first" or "lower field first". Set that to "none (progressive scan)", and you're a happier man with better video quality.
|
|
| Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:02 pm |
|
 |
flip808
Joined: 12 Nov 2008 Posts: 363 Location: Houston Texas |
|
|
|
YES! you are right again. Thanks for taking the time to follow back up on this.
You saved my ass on this one!!!!!! 
|
|
| Tue Sep 29, 2009 6:16 pm |
|
 |
Ghost Tree
Joined: 20 Apr 2009 Posts: 48 Location: Santa Barbara |
|
|
|
As a follow, how can one *intentionally* create those heat wave effects in Vegas?
|
|
| Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:13 am |
|
 |
TRCedillo
Joined: 13 Jun 2010 Posts: 1
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 691
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Post Reply with quote
Planet Hollywood Hotel Vegas Las Vegas I'm glad it helped, but that's not really what I meant, and I think what you have achieved is just a cheap fix (that propably also reduces your image's effective resolution), you can do one notch better:
You need to go to the next tab, "Media", and there's a field that says "field order", which propably says "upper field first" or "lower field first". Set that to "none (progressive scan)", and you're a happier man with better video quality. |
Was having similar problem. Sometimes the solution is so simple but would still be trying to figure out. Thanks for the post, TR
_________________ I love to travel, but hate to arrive.--Albert Einstein
Last edited by TRCedillo on Wed Jun 23, 2010 3:50 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:44 am |
|
 |
romeor
Joined: 14 Jun 2010 Posts: 1
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 691
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
I'm glad it helped, but that's not really what I meant, and I think what you have achieved is just a cheap fix (that propably also reduces your image's effective resolution), you can do one notch better:
You need to go to the next tab, "Media", and there's a field that says "field order", which propably says "upper field first" or "lower field first". Set that to "none (progressive scan)", and you're a happier man with better video quality.
Venetian Las Vegas Vegas Night Clubs
Post Reply with quote |
Was having similar problem. Sometimes the solution is so simple but would still be trying to figure out. Thanks for the post, TR |
__________
Ahaaaaaa. I wish I would have read this post sooner rather than later but I am so relieved to see that there is a quick fix to this madness.
Thanks!
_________________ Fondly,
R. Omero |
|
| Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:51 pm |
|
 |
bradsar
Joined: 11 Jul 2010 Posts: 1
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 691
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
I'm glad it helped, but that's not really what I meant, and I think what you have achieved is just a cheap fix (that propably also reduces your image's effective resolution), you can do one notch better:
You need to go to the next tab, "Media", and there's a field that says "field order", which propably says "upper field first" or "lower field first". Set that to "none (progressive scan)", and you're a happier man with better video quality.
Rio Hotel Vegas Las Vegas Palazzo
Post Reply with quote |
Was having similar problem. Sometimes the solution is so simple but would still be trying to figure out. Thanks for the post, TR |
__________
Ahaaaaaa. I wish I would have read this post sooner rather than later but I am so relieved to see that there is a quick fix to this madness.
Thanks! |
I can't seem to locate "field order"... UGHHHH I am frustrated!
_________________ Live to read.... |
|
| Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:01 am |
|
 |
tlove1111
Joined: 02 Mar 2010 Posts: 2
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 691
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
I'm glad it helped, but that's not really what I meant, and I think what you have achieved is just a cheap fix (that propably also reduces your image's effective resolution), you can do one notch better:
You need to go to the next tab, "Media", and there's a field that says "field order", which propably says "upper field first" or "lower field first". Set that to "none (progressive scan)", and you're a happier man with better video quality.
Caesars Palace Hotel Las Vegas
New York New York Hotel Vegas
Post Reply with quote |
Was having similar problem. Sometimes the solution is so simple but would still be trying to figure out. Thanks for the post, TR |
__________
Ahaaaaaa. I wish I would have read this post sooner rather than later but I am so relieved to see that there is a quick fix to this madness.
Thanks! |
I can't seem to locate "field order"... UGHHHH I am frustrated! |
any luck :/??
-tay
|
|
| Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:39 pm |
|
 |
|